Traffic pattern
Steady production load, a bursty release line
- Stateless request flow
- Several releases a week
- Growth linear with tenant count
Solution scenario
A team ships several releases a week while tenant data stays in place. This page shows environment separation, the promotion line and the persistent volume.
Overview
The first decision is the level of separation. Environments are separated at namespace level: development, staging and production live in the same cluster behind different boundaries, a release is promoted in one direction only and is never written straight into production. The second decision is where tenant data sits; the application container changes with every release, while the persistent volume stays in place. The third is the ingress layer: requests are stateless, so the load balancer distributes across the pool. With few containers, Compute is enough; as tenant count grows, VKE is the fit. If staging and production share a node pool, the capacity spike at release reaches tenant requests. The managed database is positioned as the data layer in this architecture and will soon be generally available.
Typical workload profile
Production load is steady and grows linearly with tenant count, while the release line is bursty and asks for capacity several times a day. When both axes share the same node pool, the spike at deploy time reaches production requests. The profile therefore defines the traffic pattern separately from tenant growth.
Traffic pattern
Data volume
Latency and compliance
The profile describes steady production load, a bursty release line and tenant growth as separate axes.
Reference architecture
The architecture reads as horizontal lanes: one lane per environment, one namespace per environment. The arrow between lanes runs downwards only, and nothing is written straight into production. Tenant traffic enters the production pool through the load balancer.
PortvMind Cloud services used
VKE owns the environment and tenant boundaries, Compute the runners and the production pool, Load Balancer the stateless traffic, and Block Storage the tenant data that outlives a release. The critical point in this split is simple: the container is replaced on every release, the volume is not. Without that separation every deploy becomes a data-movement risk.
Environment and tenant separation is drawn at namespace level with this service.
Runners, release tests and the production pool come from the same node profile.
Stateless tenant requests are distributed across the pool according to health signals.
Tenant data stays on a persistent volume independent of the release.
Each service page links back to this scenario; the link is generated from the same list in both directions. All Services
Evaluation criteria
The table covers the orchestration threshold, environment separation, the managed database and tenant data. The managed database is positioned as the data layer and will soon be generally available. Environment separation and the tenant volume are set before the cluster is created.
| Criterion | Question asked | Answer in this scenario |
|---|---|---|
| Orchestration threshold | Does this team need Kubernetes today? | With few tenants and services, plain Compute; once separation and promotion needs grow, VKE. |
| Environment separation | Will environments be separate clusters or separate namespaces? | This reference chooses the namespace level; promotion is one-way and never writes straight into production. |
| Managed database | Can the database be taken as a managed service? | Yes. The managed database is positioned as the data layer and will soon be generally available. |
| Tenant data | Does a scaling decision move tenant data? | No — the application container is stateless and the persistent volume stays tied to the tenant. |
The managed database is the data layer and will soon be generally available. Environment separation, the promotion line and the tenant volume are planned before the cluster is created.
Related guides and documentation
The guides cover the difference between containers and orchestration and how responsibility is split in a managed cluster. Provisioning infrastructure as code and bringing up a first cluster are handled step by step in the documentation.
Kubernetes is an open-source orchestration platform that automates the deployment, scaling and lifecycle of containerized applications. It does not write application code and is not a container runtime by itself. Instead, it continuously compares your declared desired state with the actual state of a cluster, schedules pods, replaces failed workloads and routes service traffic to available replicas.
Docker tools focus on packaging an application and its dependencies as a container image, sharing that image and running it as a container. Kubernetes deploys, scales and maintains containerized workloads across a cluster of nodes. They are not direct competitors: image creation and local runtime workflows solve a different problem from multi-server orchestration.
Managed Kubernetes moves part of the control-plane work to the provider. Applications, images, access policy, secrets, data protection and recovery stay with the team. Write down provider scope and the team owner for every operating area.
Go directly to the setup and infrastructure automation guide on Discuss.
Go directly to the account creation guide on Discuss.
An intraday transaction band, an end-of-day batch band and a retention period.
A campaign peak with a known date, an elastic pool and an egress budget.
Stateful sessions, the matchmaking decision and asset distribution.
Share your release rhythm, tenant model and current deployment tooling; in the architecture consultation we settle the orchestration threshold and the persistent volume plan together.